Dear VoteVets supporter –
Last week, John Boehner said that Republicans were locked in an “epic battle” to keep the government shutdown going.
The Tea Party Shutdown is not an epic battle — it is bad governance.
Americans and veterans like me depend on our entire government being open.
I filmed a television ad with VoteVets, and it’s on the air starting today. I hope you’ll watch it and contribute to help keep it up.
After receiving General Wesley Clark‘s email last week, I responded with my personal story about how the shutdown impacts my life, while expressing my disgust with the Republican Party’s politicization of the World War II Memorial shortly after the shutdown began.
I served this nation with honor. Today, I can’t say the same thing about most Republicans in Congress.
Thank you for standing up for me,
World War II Veteran
Tag Archives: Republicans
The Congressional vote on whether to strike Syria offers insight into which wing of the Republican Party — the traditional hawks or a growing bloc of non-interventionists — has the advantage in foreign policy debates.
Republican divisions on national security have flared over drone use, aid to Egypt, and the National Security Agency surveillance practices. Tensions have played out in battles between Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. In a rare moment of clarity, Sen. McCain called Mr. Paul and his compatriots “wacko birds.” In return, Mr. Paul suggested that hawks like Mr. McCain were “moss covered.”
Former spats could pale in comparison with the fight over whether to attack Syria, an issue on which Sen. McCain and Sen. Paul will be the leading spokesmen for their party’s two wings.
Mr. McCain has long advocated intervention in Syria’s civil war. After meeting with President Obama at the White House on Monday, he said that it would be “catastrophic” if Congress did not approve the president’s proposal and that such a rejection would result in the United States’s credibility being “shredded.”
Mr. Paul on Sunday made clear his opposition to Mr. Obama’s proposal, taking to Twitter and the talk shows to taunt Secretary of State John Kerry. “John Kerry is, you know, he’s famous for saying, you know, how can you ask a man to be the last one to die for a mistake?” Mr. Paul said. “I would ask John Kerry, how can you ask a man to be the first one to die for a mistake?”
Mr. Paul is very aware that the vote offers just that chance to reorient the Republican center on foreign affairs, and the debate gives him the chance to re-establish himself as the voice of the Tea Party movement.
Syria has important implications for the 2016 Republican presidential contest. White House hopefuls in Congress will be forced to choose between the wishes of Tea Party activists opposed to a strike and the wishes of more traditional Republicans, whose ranks include some major donors and Israel supporters. A “yea” vote on taking action in Syria would put opponents of Sen. Paul, like Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, on the same side as Pres. Obama.
Via The New York Times.
Friday marked the fortieth (40th!) time the House of Representatives voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
I spoke with a friend about the vote yesterday.
“I wonder,” he said, “what these votes are costing taxpayers.”
Strap yourselves in, readers; you’re about to learn what these votes headed by “fiscal conservatives” are costing the American people.
Last year, CBS News calculated that the first thirty-three votes to repeal the ACA took eighty hours of floor time at the House or about two full work weeks. According to the Congressional Research Service, it costs about $24 million to run the House for a week, so it cost about $48 million for just the first thirty-three votes. (I can’t believe I said “just the first thirty-three votes.” This is ridiculous.) That translates to about $1.45 million per vote.
Based on that number, it has cost the American taxpayer a total of $58 million for the Republicans to make their symbolic votes against the ACA.
In addition, the Congressional Budget Office estimated last year that repeal of the bill would add $109 billion to the deficit over the next decade.
Via CBS Miami.
Arkansas legislators have overridden Democratic Governor Mike Beebe’s veto of a twelve-week abortion ban, which will go into effect this spring. Here’s what you need to know about the first “fetal heartbeat” abortion measure in the nation:
- The governor vetoed the bill because it is unconstitutional. Under Roe v. Wade, women have a right to legal abortion services until the point of viability (which is usually considered to be at twenty-four weeks).
- This isn’t the first abortion ban Arkansas Republicans have forced on the governor. Just last week, lawmakers voted to override Gov. Beebe’s veto of a twenty-week “fetal pain” abortion ban.
- “Fetal heartbeat” bans are not rooted in science. Heartbeat measures are simply trying to redefine the medical terms of pregnancy.
- Arkansas now has the strictest abortion ban in the country. “Heartbeat” bills have popped up across the country, but Arkansas is the only state to have passed them into law.
- Republicans realize they are inviting legal challenges. Advocacy groups such as the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights have already threatened legal action against Arkansas. When the governor vetoed this abortion ban, he indicated that he wanted to avoid the court battles it would bring. Now the people of Arkansas will be on the hook for the court costs of these legal battles.
In his first television interview since the election, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney said that it “kills” him to not be in the White House.
In the interview with Chris Wallace, Gov. Romney also said that he believed he’d won the election until the Ohio election results were announced.
Asked if she thought that her husband would win the election, Ann Romney said, “I for sure did.”
Gov. Romney called his inability to win the votes of people of color “a real weakness” that future Republican candidates will have to overcome: “Uh, we did very well with the majority population, but not with minority populations. And — and that was a — that was a failing. That was a real mistake.”
He also admitted that his “forty-seven percent” comments caused him great harm.
The Buffett Rule, proposed last year by President Barack Obama, grew out of the argument that wealthy people should pay a higher share of their income in taxes than those in the middle class. Its name comes from the fact that billionaire investor Warren Buffett pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary.
The Senate result was expected; passage in the Republican-controlled House also was unlikely.
In a CNN/ORC International poll released Monday, 72% said they favor the bill while 27% oppose it.
House Republicans return from spring recess next week to face the difficult task of filling the holes in the House-passed budget.
Committees will begin drafting legislation to meet a budget-mandated $261 billion in savings over the next decade.
Critics say the budget is less groundbreaking than its supporters say it is. Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, chairman of the House Budget Committee, included few details or instructions to make them happen.
The two biggest question marks are on a tax overhaul and “other mandatory” cuts. On taxes, collapsing the current six tax brackets into two, with the highest bracket dropping to 25% from 35%, would cost the Treasury $4.5 trillion over ten years, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. Paying for that with loophole closings cannot be done.