Tag Archives: Abortion

September is Abortion Access Month

English: There is a prohibition on the use of ...

English: There is a prohibition on the use of federal government funds for abortion in the United States. However, some states fund abortions out of their own revenues. State funds abortions through legislation State funds abortions under court order (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

September is Abortion Access Month. As it turns out, it takes quite a bit to get an abortion in this country, and accessing safe and legal abortion care is becoming more difficult. One of the biggest hurdles for folks seeking abortion care is the fact that, for many, it is quite simply unaffordable. Who are the folks that cannot afford abortion care?

The National Network of Abortion Funds helps to bridge the gap between a legal abortion and the ability to afford one by fighting laws that undermine access to safe and legal abortion care while helping folks who need abortions today.

The Hyde Amendment means that low-income folks who have their health care covered by Medicaid have to come up with a way to pay for their procedures out-of-pocket, even though the fact that they are on Medicaid means they’re already having trouble making ends meet. Women of color, who are disproportionately poor, bear the brunt of these restrictions. Queer, trans, gender non-conforming, and genderqueer folks – also disproportionately poor– bear a heavy part of this weight. (And yes, trans folks might need an abortion, and reproductive health care is indeed a trans health issue.)

The National Network of Abortion Funds’ annual survey shows that on average, funds are only able to help one of every seven people who contact them for help. The funds are to bridge the gap between what patients have and the cost of an abortion. This process includes determining whether the person lives in a state that covers abortion care via Medicaid (only seventeen do); how much the procedure will cost, how much the person has, and what they could sell to come closer to that amount; whether there is a nearby clinic, and if it requires a waiting period, a mandatory ultrasound, or any other non-medically necessary procedure; whether they have a way to get to the clinic, or a place to stay if it’s a two-day procedure; and details about childcare, elder care, and work schedules.

These are just the logistical concerns. This gap exists because we (as a society) do not treat abortion as health care. We do not take it seriously as a social and medical need. And we devalue the experiences of millions for whom this gap is the difference between getting the care they need and having it unavailable to them.

We must call for an end to the bans on federal funding for abortion care. An abortion costs an average of $451 in the first trimester and can sometimes cost $3,000 or more. This is an impossible sum for many people. Every pregnant person must decide whether to bring a child into the world. We cannot continue to allow religious extremists and politicians to interfere in a family’s decision about how many children to have and when to have them.

That is why this month is Abortion Access Month. September 30 is the 38th anniversary of the Hyde Amendment, and September 28th is the Global Day of Action for Access to Safe and Legal Abortion. During this month, be motivated to end the deep disparity created by politicians withholding federal funds, and to remember that we are the experts on our own lives. We deserve the tools and opportunity to build the futures and families we want and need. We invite you to join us and add your voice to a loud and unapologetic call to all our policymakers: let’s end the unequal health care system that treats reproductive health care as something separate from all other health care. Let’s repeal the Hyde Amendment!

Join @abortionfunds with #ACCESS13 for more information about what you can do. But, please start by signing the petition to repeal the Hyde Amendment.

Via Feministing.

Leave a comment

Filed under Science Schmience, War on Women

Poll: 66% Opposed to Ban on Abortion after 20 Weeks

Planned Parenthood volunteers help bring the f...

Planned Parenthood volunteers help bring the fight for health insurance reform to the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Sixty-six percent of people believe that abortions should be legal after twenty weeks if the woman would “suffer serious long-term health problems” from a full-term pregnancy, according to a new survey.

Sixty-one percent said the procedure should be legal in cases when the fetus is not viable, or when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/319509-poll-finds-opposition-to-20-week-abortion-ban-in-specific-cases?utm_campaign=Choice&utm_medium=Argyle%2BSocial&utm_source=twitter&utm_term=2013-08-30-16-26-09#ixzz2dWVPylOx

Leave a comment

Filed under Health, National, Polls, Science, War on Women

Arizona Anti-Abortion Bill Starts Counting Fetal Age Before Conception

pregnancy test

pregnancy test (Photo credit: slayerphoto)

A week ago, hundreds of Catholics rallied in Phoenix, Arizona to protest the Affordable Care Act. The Catholic Sun has a nice gallery of photos on Flickr, in which placards are visible in the sunshine, reading “Pray to End Abortion,” “God’s Will Not Obama’s Will,” and “Religious Freedom for All.”

Less than a week after that protest, the Legislature state passed the most restrictive anti-abortion legislation we’ve seen since the Great Republican Takeover of 2010. In Arizona, they’re going beyond “fetal pain” bills like Nebraska’s, which outlaw abortions twenty weeks into the actual pregnancy.

Last Thursday, the Arizona House passed HB 2036, which would make abortions illegal after twenty weeks, but what matters most is when those 20 weeks begin. Confused? Kate Sheppard of Mother Jones breaks it down:

…Arizona’s law would actually be more restrictive than others, as the bill states that the gestational age of the fetus should be “calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman…”

Most women ovulate about 14 or 15 days after their period starts, and women can usually get pregnant from sexual intercourse that occurred anywhere between five days before ovulation and a day after it. Arizona’s law would start the clock at a woman’s last period—which means, in practice, that the law prohibits abortion later than 18 weeks after a woman actually becomes pregnant.

Amanda Marcotte, writing in RH Reality Check, points out that this isn’t about preventing abortion so much as it is about combining legal authority with moral and using both to restrict women’s sex lives:

Now with this Arizona bill, if a woman is deemed pregnant two weeks before she actually is, prosecutors could even have a chance to look at your choices when you weren’t even pregnant—before you even had the sex that made you pregnant—and blame those choices for bad outcomes. They’re creating, brick by brick, the legal basis on which to prosecute a woman who drinks some alcohol, becomes pregnant two weeks later, and miscarries, even though she didn’t drink while pregnant. And you best believe that when feminists protest this, they’ll just paint it as if we’re more interested in protecting drunken sluts than “babies.”

When you ask why a party would gin up a fake federal war against Catholicism while at the same time it passes laws like this, you’ve likely answered your own question.

Via MSNBC.

1 Comment

Filed under Health, Law, Sick Sad World, War on Women

55% of Women Live in Anti-Choice States

Attention All Republicans... Insert legislatio...

(Photo credit: EN2008)

Fifty-five percent of reproductive-age U.S. women lived in an anti-choice state in 2011, up from 31% in 2000, according to a Guttmacher Institute policy analysis.

The increase is the result of a shift in the abortion policy landscape at the state level, including a record number of abortion restrictions enacted in 2011.

“In 2000, the country was more evenly divided: nearly a third of women lived in states solidly hostile to abortion rights, slightly more than a third in states supportive of abortion rights and close to a third in middle-ground states,” says Rachel Benson Gold, Guttmacher’s director of policy analysis. “By 2011, however, more than half of women of reproductive age lived in hostile states. This growth came largely at the expense of the states in the middle. Only one in 10 women lived in a middle-ground state by 2011.”

Via Guttmacher.org.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health, National, War on Women

Washington Poised to Require Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance

English: Rep. Albert Wynn (left) joins Gloria ...

Image via Wikipedia

At a time when many states are making it harder for women to get abortions, Washington appears headed in the opposite direction.

Fifteen states restrict insurers from covering abortions. Twelve are considering such measures. By contrast, a bill that has passed Washington’s House and is working its way through the Senate would make the state the first to require all health-insurance plans except those claiming a conscience-based exemption to include abortion coverage.

The measure, House Bill 2330, would require insurers who cover maternity care, which Washington insurers must offer, to pay for abortions. New York is the only other state considering similar rules, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

Supporters say the state is protected by its existing conscience exemptions and note the bill has a self-destruct clause nullifying it in the event it were found to conflict with federal law. They say it would simply makes sure that women in Washington, one of four states to have legalized abortion before the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, continue to have easy access to abortions once changes in federal health-care laws take effect in 2014.

“Washington state has historically been in the forefront for women’s reproductive rights,” said Rep. Eileen Cody. “We’re just trying to maintain the status quo.”

Via The Seattle Times.

Leave a comment

Filed under Cheers!, Health, Politics

Georgia Democrats Introduce Bill Banning Vasectomies in Response to Attacks on Abortion Rights

English: Close-up of the Georgia State Capitol.

Image via Wikipedia

The Georgia House Judiciary Committee will take up a measure that would prohibit abortions past the twentieth week of pregnancy.

The bill sponsored by Doug McKillip (R-Athens) attempts to tighten “life of the mother” exceptions to abortion:

No such condition shall be deemed to exist if it is based on a diagnosis or claim of a mental or emotional condition of the pregnant woman or that the pregnant woman will purposefully engage in conduct which she intends to result in her death or in substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.

In response, House Democrats scheduled a hearing at the state Capitol to propose a bill that would ban Georgia men from seeking vasectomies.

From the press release:

“Thousands of children are deprived of birth in this state every year because of the lack of state regulation over vasectomies,” said Rep. Yasmin Neal, author of the bill. “It is patently unfair that men can avoid unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly, while women’s ability to decide is constantly up for debate throughout the United States.”

House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams added, “The Republican attack on women’s reproductive rights is unconscionable. What is more deplorable is the hypocrisy of HB 954’s author. If we follow his logic, we believe it is the obligation of this General Assembly to assert an equally invasive state interest in the reproductive habits of men and substitute the will of the government over the will of adult men.”

1 Comment

Filed under Cheers!, Health, Politics, War on Women

Oklahoma Legislator Tries to Ban Food Products Containing Aborted Fetuses (Which Isn’t Happening)

Seal of Oklahoma.

Image via Wikipedia

A state senator in Oklahoma has filed a bill to make it illegal to sell food or products that contain aborted fetuses.

Is this about vaccines? Is this a backdoor attempt at setting a legal precedent that will later outlaw abortion? I have no idea. Nor, apparently, does State Senator Ralph Shortey:

I don’t know if it is happening in Oklahoma, it may be, it may not be. What I am saying is that if it does happen then we are not going to allow it to manufacture here.

I don’t know what to say about this. If this is what we do now (make every gross thing illegal, whether or not it’s actually happening), then I would like a legislative effort to prevent anyone ever driving in the left lane without passing a car in the left. Oh, heck, it’s probably best to sponsor all-purpose legislation against Things That Are Bad. That should cover it.

Via Religion Dispatches.

Leave a comment

Filed under Law, Politics, Sick Sad World